![]() |
|
|
||||||
| HOMEPAGE |
|
|
Walk
Reviews
|
|
|
Review 6: Walk No. 16; Date walked: 21.08.11; Review
submitted by David Hoccom
Thanks again for an enjoyable walk. It would seem necessary to follow the right hand field edge from the two metal gates to a forestry track. Follow the track, cross a stile and enter the next field. It is not possible to see the next stile across the field so it is best to pass towards the left of the conifers ahead in a "10'o'clock" direction from the forestry track stile.
Unfortunately, there is dense undergrowth on the other side of this next stile and
we had to skirt left into the edge of the wood to get round it. Some of the stiles
need hawthorn etc trimming back to allow easier access. However, this is an enjoyable
walk along quiet lanes, fields and woodland with some lovely views and St David's
Church is interesting.
Comments: John
Nichols and I did this walk today. The directions were very clear and we particularly
liked the idea of pointing the walker in the direction of the foot slab of a
stile. Scenically it was easily the best of the twelve or so we have done so far.
And it did indeed take a bit longer than the time suggested!
Comments: Great
walk and pretty good directions. However, the paragraph below is far from correct.
It says 1 and a half miles - it is more like 3.
Editor's comment: In fact the OS Explorer map and Microsoft AutoRoute both indicate
a distance of 1.7 miles. Review 2: Walk No. 20; Date walked: 01.07.08; Review submitted by Barry Melville Comments: My friend and I felt that this was the toughest of the range of walks but the most enjoyable. The detailed instructions were 'spot on' and the scenery was fantastic. We failed to do it in the suggested five hours though. . . . . more like seven hours! __________________________________________________________________________________________________Review 1: Walk No. 14; Date walked: 26.01.07; Review submitted by Barry Melville Comments: This is an excellent walk and the notes are accurate and easy to follow. There are a couple of places where things could be added but, in general, I thought it was written better than the other 'walks' published in local books. |
|
|
|
return
to top >>>
|
Submit your own review of a walk for inclusion on the Web site.
Copyright © 2003 John Tallet
Page
last updated 25.08.11